<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debating Mormons: Winning the battle or winning the person</title>
	<atom:link href="http://markcares.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/debating-mormons-winning-the-battle-or-winning-the-person/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://markcares.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/debating-mormons-winning-the-battle-or-winning-the-person/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: germit</title>
		<link>http://markcares.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/debating-mormons-winning-the-battle-or-winning-the-person/#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>germit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcares.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>Mark: I like your post....mostly. I hedge because I am very hesitant to get locked in on one particular approach to talking to people about Jesus and the gospel.  I&#039;m admittedly new to this arena, so I&#039;m open to hearing what has worked and what has not.  I do not want to reinvent the wheel, unless a re-invented wheel is a better wheel.  

I&#039;ve noticed, though , that sometimes people have some success using &quot;style z&quot;, and they get so jazzed about it, that this becomes the &quot;way it&#039;s done&quot;.  and of course we ALL think we are biblical, and can cite a verse or verses to show that.  I&#039;m not minimizing using the WORD or studying the life of Paul, if anything, I see a lot of diversity in the NT regarding how people are reached and what worked for whom.  Maybe call that &quot;Godly flexibility&quot;  

some things that I have seen that really do NOT work 

1)personal attacks, esp. on a person&#039;s  honesty, sincerity, or intelligence (I&#039;m sure there is more that could be added to the list)

2)lurid descriptions of both JS or BY ; this is tempting because they are easy targets (in my opinion) but such descriptions seem to be conversation stoppers.  I think there&#039;s ways of getting the same information across without the National Enquirer headline.  

3) using the &quot;c&quot; word indescriminately....there may be a time and place, but leaning on this description usually ends POLITE conversation....and I think that&#039;s the goal. 

4)Sarcasm....unless directed towards yourself is usually a dud, but if used sparingly, maybe....for some, it&#039;s like the only spice they cook with, and the dish served is &quot;YECHHHH&quot;

thanks for indulging some GERMIT-opinionoids.  

peace and rest on you and yours
GERMIT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: I like your post&#8230;.mostly. I hedge because I am very hesitant to get locked in on one particular approach to talking to people about Jesus and the gospel.  I&#8217;m admittedly new to this arena, so I&#8217;m open to hearing what has worked and what has not.  I do not want to reinvent the wheel, unless a re-invented wheel is a better wheel.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed, though , that sometimes people have some success using &#8220;style z&#8221;, and they get so jazzed about it, that this becomes the &#8220;way it&#8217;s done&#8221;.  and of course we ALL think we are biblical, and can cite a verse or verses to show that.  I&#8217;m not minimizing using the WORD or studying the life of Paul, if anything, I see a lot of diversity in the NT regarding how people are reached and what worked for whom.  Maybe call that &#8220;Godly flexibility&#8221;  </p>
<p>some things that I have seen that really do NOT work </p>
<p>1)personal attacks, esp. on a person&#8217;s  honesty, sincerity, or intelligence (I&#8217;m sure there is more that could be added to the list)</p>
<p>2)lurid descriptions of both JS or BY ; this is tempting because they are easy targets (in my opinion) but such descriptions seem to be conversation stoppers.  I think there&#8217;s ways of getting the same information across without the National Enquirer headline.  </p>
<p>3) using the &#8220;c&#8221; word indescriminately&#8230;.there may be a time and place, but leaning on this description usually ends POLITE conversation&#8230;.and I think that&#8217;s the goal. </p>
<p>4)Sarcasm&#8230;.unless directed towards yourself is usually a dud, but if used sparingly, maybe&#8230;.for some, it&#8217;s like the only spice they cook with, and the dish served is &#8220;YECHHHH&#8221;</p>
<p>thanks for indulging some GERMIT-opinionoids.  </p>
<p>peace and rest on you and yours<br />
GERMIT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markcares</title>
		<link>http://markcares.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/debating-mormons-winning-the-battle-or-winning-the-person/#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>markcares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcares.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>JesusLover:
    Thanks for your words of encouragement.  To get notices of follow-up comments all you have to do is click on the RSS feed icon for comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JesusLover:<br />
    Thanks for your words of encouragement.  To get notices of follow-up comments all you have to do is click on the RSS feed icon for comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JesusLover</title>
		<link>http://markcares.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/debating-mormons-winning-the-battle-or-winning-the-person/#comment-1683</link>
		<dc:creator>JesusLover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcares.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-1683</guid>
		<description>I meant to check that I want to be notified of follow-up comments so that is why I am sending this little email - I didn&#039;t see the box to check. TQ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to check that I want to be notified of follow-up comments so that is why I am sending this little email &#8211; I didn&#8217;t see the box to check. TQ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JesusLover</title>
		<link>http://markcares.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/debating-mormons-winning-the-battle-or-winning-the-person/#comment-1681</link>
		<dc:creator>JesusLover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcares.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-1681</guid>
		<description>Mark - I think this is the most important post that you could ever put on your blog and one that we need to constantly keep before our eyes when we are talking to mormons.
I have read your book a couple of times and now subscribe to your blogs from your site. I find them the best to read not only to hear what mormons think or their responses to what we say but to find out the best way to lovingly respond to them.
My best friend is a mormon - I love him very much and desire for him to have that &quot;peace that passes all understanding&quot; and a true life in Christ. Right now he is tormented by his sins and knows that he is not worthy to live with Heavenly Father. He is genuine and has a better grasp of his sinful nature than many people I have known. I made alot of mistakes in the past while debating about our beliefs. I realize too that it is the Holy Spirit that convicts, not what I write to him about. 

I have started speaking to him about my own spiritual life. The peace I feel - the love that the Father has for me and my own sins and my response to them. If God can work best with us when we are honest with Him - I think that honesty with others and a genuine caring must be the right way too.

I intend to read your entire blog and the other two on your site also. I find it very useful to read the responses from commited mormons because it helps me to see how much language and the different way that we use it impacts on what we say. I love my friend so much and want him to find the real Jesus. I don&#039;t care about winning debates or discussing endless points - you are so right about focusing on Jesus and what you wrote about Paul determining to preach only Christ crucified............I am going to pray this also for myself.

Thankyou so much for your ministry!!! I&#039;ve never commented here before but I am reading daily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8211; I think this is the most important post that you could ever put on your blog and one that we need to constantly keep before our eyes when we are talking to mormons.<br />
I have read your book a couple of times and now subscribe to your blogs from your site. I find them the best to read not only to hear what mormons think or their responses to what we say but to find out the best way to lovingly respond to them.<br />
My best friend is a mormon &#8211; I love him very much and desire for him to have that &#8220;peace that passes all understanding&#8221; and a true life in Christ. Right now he is tormented by his sins and knows that he is not worthy to live with Heavenly Father. He is genuine and has a better grasp of his sinful nature than many people I have known. I made alot of mistakes in the past while debating about our beliefs. I realize too that it is the Holy Spirit that convicts, not what I write to him about. </p>
<p>I have started speaking to him about my own spiritual life. The peace I feel &#8211; the love that the Father has for me and my own sins and my response to them. If God can work best with us when we are honest with Him &#8211; I think that honesty with others and a genuine caring must be the right way too.</p>
<p>I intend to read your entire blog and the other two on your site also. I find it very useful to read the responses from commited mormons because it helps me to see how much language and the different way that we use it impacts on what we say. I love my friend so much and want him to find the real Jesus. I don&#8217;t care about winning debates or discussing endless points &#8211; you are so right about focusing on Jesus and what you wrote about Paul determining to preach only Christ crucified&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;I am going to pray this also for myself.</p>
<p>Thankyou so much for your ministry!!! I&#8217;ve never commented here before but I am reading daily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GERMIT</title>
		<link>http://markcares.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/debating-mormons-winning-the-battle-or-winning-the-person/#comment-1665</link>
		<dc:creator>GERMIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcares.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-1665</guid>
		<description>I think it is very important for individuals to consistently evaluate their approaches with people of other faiths and monitor the results of those communications. 


very well put.....I also liked:

 contemplate on the merits and demerits of particular approaches, and evaluate whether the approach or method actually achieves the intended goal.

Spot on, sir....know yourself...know your audience (as best you can)....know what is (and isn&#039;t) happening.

take your gifts, work, and calling seriously, do NOT take yourself too seriously.

GERMIT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is very important for individuals to consistently evaluate their approaches with people of other faiths and monitor the results of those communications. </p>
<p>very well put&#8230;..I also liked:</p>
<p> contemplate on the merits and demerits of particular approaches, and evaluate whether the approach or method actually achieves the intended goal.</p>
<p>Spot on, sir&#8230;.know yourself&#8230;know your audience (as best you can)&#8230;.know what is (and isn&#8217;t) happening.</p>
<p>take your gifts, work, and calling seriously, do NOT take yourself too seriously.</p>
<p>GERMIT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aquinas</title>
		<link>http://markcares.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/debating-mormons-winning-the-battle-or-winning-the-person/#comment-1664</link>
		<dc:creator>aquinas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcares.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-1664</guid>
		<description>Mark, I really like the spirit of this post.  I&#039;ve witnesses several times over debates between Latter-day Saints and Evangelicals that were more focused on winning or vanquishing the &quot;opponent.&quot;  I appreciate that in this post you are making a distinction between &quot;meaningless battles&quot; and and more meaningful &quot;witnessing approaches&quot; that focus on preaching Christ and him crucified.

I think it is very important for individuals to consistently evaluate their approaches with people of other faiths and monitor the results of those communications.  I wish more individuals would reflect more on the nature of their actual goal, contemplate on the merits and demerits of particular approaches, and evaluate whether the approach or method actually achieves the intended goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I really like the spirit of this post.  I&#8217;ve witnesses several times over debates between Latter-day Saints and Evangelicals that were more focused on winning or vanquishing the &#8220;opponent.&#8221;  I appreciate that in this post you are making a distinction between &#8220;meaningless battles&#8221; and and more meaningful &#8220;witnessing approaches&#8221; that focus on preaching Christ and him crucified.</p>
<p>I think it is very important for individuals to consistently evaluate their approaches with people of other faiths and monitor the results of those communications.  I wish more individuals would reflect more on the nature of their actual goal, contemplate on the merits and demerits of particular approaches, and evaluate whether the approach or method actually achieves the intended goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
