07
Sep
09

FORGIVENESS REVISITED

 

    Over the past few months, I have addressed forgiveness a number of times.  Therefore some might be wondering why visit it again.  The reasons are two-fold:

           1) It is such a crucial issue in our relationship with God. 

            2) It is a central issue of contention between Christians and Mormons.

     There are various ways to summarize the different ways Mormonism and Christianity view forgiveness.  One of the simplest for me is that in Mormonism, forgiveness hinges on the “painful process” of repentance worked by people while in Christianity it is a joyful announcement made by God.  One good example of the latter is recorded in 2 Samuel 12:13 after King David had committed adultery with Bathsheba and had her husband, Uriah, killed.  “And David said unto Nathan, I have sinned against the LORD.  And Nathan said unto David, “The LORD also hath put away thy sin; thou shalt not die.” 

     Yes, David did suffer ongoing consequences of his sin.  But those consequences weren’t part of his being forgiven.  The Lord announced the forgiveness.  Period.  Then he talked about the consequences David would have to suffer because of his sin.  David was forgiven before he even had the chance to begin the “painful process” of repentance.

     In fact, the idea that we can do anything to be forgiven goes against what Jesus said in Luke 17:7-10.  “But which of you, having a servant plowing or feeding cattle, will say unto him by and by, when he is come from the field, Go and sit down to meat?  And will not rather say unto him, Make ready wherewith I may sup, and gird thyself, and serve me, till I have eaten and drunken; and afterward thou shalt eat and drink?  Doth he thank that servant because he did the things that were commanded him?  I trow not.  So likewise ye, when ye shall have all those things which are commanded you, say, We are unprofitable servants; we have done that which was our duty to do.”

     As Jesus here says, after we have done “all those things which are commanded” all we are to say is that we have done our duty.  If doing everything is just doing our duty, that leaves no possibility for doing something extra.  In other words, we can’t contribute anything in the area of forgiveness because our duty is already to do everything.

     That’s why our forgiveness hinges entirely on what Jesus has done for us.  That is why God can now announce forgiveness to us rather than making it contingent on our working through a painful process.  That is why King David could write:  “Blessed is he who transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered.”  (Psalm 32:1)

Advertisements

2 Responses to “FORGIVENESS REVISITED”


  1. 1 Jon R
    September 8, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    Pastor Cares,
    Am holding a youth Bible class at our WELS church on what different religions teach. Each time I re-read the truth in love book as often as possible not only for this class but for a refresher.

    As preparing for this class, the prodical son story had a different light as it pertained to forgiveness. The son didn’t “do all he could do” when it came to forgiveness.
    Jesus says..”But while he was still a long way off, his father saw him” The father could have waited till he (the son) was a “shorter way”, or waited till the son seen him.

    Yes the son asked for forgiveness, and the father’s response was one of complete unconditional forgiveness…no part of the son showing his worthiness to called a son again.

    What joy we have….we don’t have to do all we can do. The father looks for us a long way before we see him!

  2. 2 Jon R
    September 8, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    After I sent the first message…I thought I wasn’t to clear on the father’s response

    If we are to do “all we can do” the father could have waited till:
    1. the son made eye contact with him before rushing out
    2. got within shouting distance
    3. because the son may be wasn’t sincere about coming back to repay his debt
    4. assign him the title “slave” as the son reasoned to gain back the favor of the father
    5. could have took his time in meeting the son…”like I’ll make him think about this”

    The object of the prodical son is just as much about the father’s unconditional restoration as it is about the son’s coming to his senses but concluding incorrectly that he wasn’t worthy enough to be fully forgiven.


Comments are currently closed.

September 2009
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Blog Stats

  • 182,150 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 998 other followers


%d bloggers like this: