Posts Tagged ‘LDS Church


The Temptation of Jesus

      This Sunday I will be preaching on Jesus’ temptation in the wilderness.  Today, as I began preparing my message, I was again struck by Matthew’s wording, “Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil.”  This occurred right after Jesus’ baptism and entrance into his public ministry.  Immediately the battle is joined.  But what I so appreciate is that it’s God who takes the initiative – Jesus is led by the Spirit to be tempted.

      I appreciate this so much because here Jesus is already acting as my Hero, my Substitute.  Jesus did not just die for us, he also lived for us.  Paul wrote to the Romans: “For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.” (Romans 5:19)  Not only did God credit Jesus death on the cross as payment for our sins, he also credited Jesus’ obedient life to us as our obedience.  It is his perfect life, his righteousness that makes me acceptable to God.

     That is why I so appreciate how Jesus’ temptation is recorded.  Jesus is taking the initiative to do what we couldn’t do.  Unlike Israel’s 40 years of repeated failures in the wilderness, Jesus experienced 40 days of victory in the wilderness – for Luke tells us that Jesus was tempted all 40 days.  “Being forty days tempted of the devil.”  (Luke 4:2)  His successful resisting of the devil’s temptation serves much more than an example for me; it serves as a wonderful reassurance that God already sees me as successfully resisting the devil – in Christ.

     For curiosity sake, I looked to see how the LDS Church talked about Jesus’ temptation.  This is what I found in its manual, The Life and Teaching of Jesus & His Apostles. 

     Matthew 4:1: Did Jesus Go into the Wilderness to Be Tempted?

         Compare the Inspired Version account of these verses with the King James.

         “Then Jesus was led up of the spirit, into the wilderness, to be with God.

         “And when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, and had communed with God, he was afterwards an hungered, and was left to be tempted of the devil.” (Matthew 4:1, 2, Inspired Version. Italics added.)

          “Jesus did not go into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil; righteous men do not seek out temptation. He went ‘to be with God.’ Probably he was visited by the Father; without question he received transcendent spiritual manifestations. The temptations came after he ‘had communed with God,’ ‘after forty days.’ The same was true in the case of Moses. He communed with God, saw the visions of eternity, and was then left unto himself to be tempted of the devil. After resisting temptation he again communed with Deity, gaining further light and revelation.” (McConkie, DNTC, 1:128; see also Mosiah 3:7.)

     Both the change made by the Joseph Smith in the Inspired Version, and the explanation by McConkie, remove the idea of God taking the battle to the devil.  That not only drastically changes the meaning but also, for me, dramatically weakens this account.


Robert L. Millet and the LDS Church


     The most prominent Mormon author that writes about grace is Robert L. Millet.  Some Mormons rely on his work quite extensively. But do his views represent official LDS teaching?  A couple of his books that I have read include a statement like the following:  “This work is a private endeavor that does not presume to speak for either Brigham Young University or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.”

     So how much of his work does the LDS Church recognize?  I did a search on and found some articles that he had written for the Ensign in the 80’s and 90’s but nothing since.  Especially noticeable by their absence were any articles written by him on grace – one of his key topics.  I did find him mentioned in a couple of footnotes by other authors in some later editions – but that was about all.  I don’t see his emphasis on grace being echoed or even recognized by the leadership of the LDS Church.  The disclaimer that he puts in the front of his books is accurate – his work does not speak for the LDS Church.

     Therefore, when speaking with Mormons who refer to Millet it is important to establish the fact that his ideas do not represent official Mormonism.  In fact, he relates in the preface of his book “Grace Works” how one Church leader told him how some of the brethren were quite uneasy and uncomfortable with this emphasis on grace.  He says that he does not presume to speak for the LDS Church.  The LDS Church hasn’t said that he represents it.  Therefore it would be wrong for us or anybody else to say that his words represent official Mormonism.  If we want to see what the LDS Church officially says we need to study the sources it says represents it – especially its scriptures, living prophet and apostles.

June 2020

Blog Stats

  • 182,897 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 997 other followers